Once upon a time, OpenSea’s biggest headache was their site going down during overwhelming periods of traffic. Despite the waves of frustration vented on Twitter when it happened, this was certainly a good problem to have in the grand scheme of things!
However, fast forward a year and a half to the present day and OpenSea are fighting much bigger monsters than a lagging server and waves of ‘BrokenSea’ memes.
Marketplace war heating up
As covered recently, Blur.io has emerged as a real contender to take a significant chunk of OpenSea’s market share. Their aggressive tactics have left public opinion split on whether they are a force for good or not in the NFT space – and you can revisit some of these features below to make your own mind up on the matter:
If OpenSea didn’t have enough on their plate dealing with Blur alone, it emerged last week that LooksRare has hot-tagged themselves into the contest by forming an alliance of sorts with Blur – with the two up-and-coming marketplaces taking aim at OpenSea’s highly controversial flagging policy as their target.
What Is The OpenSea Flag Policy?
Unfortunately, scams and thefts are rife in the world of Web3. The responsibility of self-custody is a double-edged sword, and many have fallen foul to hacks and social engineering scams, leading to their wallets being drained of their assets. As we know, there is no customer service hotline in Web3.
OpenSea, however, did implement a policy that tried to put themselves in the position of a customer service solution. If a user has their NFTs stolen, they are able to flag the assets as such to OS, who will then block the ability for anyone to buy or sell that asset ever again on their platform.
What Problems Did This Solve?
Many believe nothing was solved. It’s even been argued that it caused more problems! Let’s examine a scenario which often played out:
- Scam occurs, user wallet is drained by a bad actor
- Bad actor, now in possession of stolen goods, accepts the highest WETH bid on the asset.
- Bad actor flees into the good night with a pocket full of WETH
- Victim notices they have been scammed. Flags stolen asset to OpenSea
- OpenSea blocks trading functionality on said asset.
- New holder, the person who had their WETH bid accepted in point 2, is left with an asset which cannot be traded on OpenSea
Here is a live example of the above scenario which occurred in 2021. Bear in mind this was when ETH was trading at around $4500, so this problem was valued at around $180,000 for the new buyer:
Here's my thread about how @opensea unreasonably blocked my account and frozen all my NFTs after my offer 40 weth for @BoredApeYC #6267 was accepted.
I think it's very important to spread this case among NFT community!
Let's start ⬇️ pic.twitter.com/xnxctpzzpL— Mpa3yka (@Mpa3yka) November 10, 2021
OpenSea revised their policy some time later, acknowledging the flaw in the system and implementing a pilot program that they say detects NFT theft in real time. Additionally, victims would need to file a police report within 7 days for the blocks to stay active.
1/ Can we address the 🐘 in the room? We want to provide you more clarity and transparency around our stolen items policy ↯
— OpenSea (@opensea) August 10, 2022
Rivals Capitalize On Public Discontent
LooksRare and @blur_io will no longer show third-party flags on the UI by default, as of today.
𝗪𝗵𝘆?
Flags hurt more people than they protect.𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝗳 𝗜 𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝘄𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝗲𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺?
Head into your account settings and enable them.— LooksRare (@LooksRare) February 23, 2023
OpenSea is clearly in a tough position, as it is against US law to knowingly allow the sale and transfer of stolen items. “We do not want to incentivize theft by allowing our platform to be used to help sell stolen items.” OpenSea stated. A highly understandable stance, but the difficulty is that innocents are getting caught in the crossfire of the enforcement.
Blur.io, who have made themselves a very large and uncomfortable thorn in the side of OpenSea for a while now, announced on 24th February that they and fellow rival NFT marketplace, LooksRare, would no longer display these flags set by OpenSea as default:
1/2 Starting today, Blur and @LooksRare will no longer show third party flags in the UI by default.
We've found that flags hurt end users more than they help.
— Blur (@blur_io) February 23, 2023
To cater to users on both sides – those who support flags and those who do not – the visibility of the flags is an optional setting which users can switch on and off at will.
Final Thoughts
It’s certainly an interesting development in the marketplace wars which has got everyone talking.
Blur has garnered a lot of goodwill from traders since the airdrop earlier this month, and trading volume stats have indicated that many are now conducting their business over there instead of OpenSea.
Conversely, OpenSea’s reputation has taken hits from it’s responses to the attacks from Blur, so this announcement regarding flags – a highly scrutinized policy – appears to be a strategic assault to further damage the public image of OpenSea.
Ultimately, flagged items were more of an issue when OpenSea were the only real player in town. Now that the landscape is starting to shift, the impact of the policy is defanged to an extent.
Most people in the space seem to believe their nfts are in opensea.
I think this missunderstanding is what makes flags so relevant.
Your assets are in your wallet, opensea just displays them for you with images, they hold absolutely 0 power over any of them.
— Shino (@ShinoNFT25) February 26, 2023
A Note Regarding Security
The harsh reality is the responsibility of self-custody requires accountability for the security practices you enact.
Always use a hardware wallet for high value items, be suspicious of all DMs from unknown people, and think very carefully before clicking links and signing transactions on MetaMask.
Following those basic rules will decrease your chances dramatically of ever having to consider using OpenSea’s flagging feature.
This is a Contributor Post. Opinions expressed here are opinions of the Contributor. Influencive does not endorse or review brands mentioned; does not and cannot investigate relationships with brands, products, and people mentioned and is up to the Contributor to disclose. Contributors, amongst other accounts and articles may be professional fee-based.